Author Archives: I'M WITH THE B(R)AND

10 Legal Considerations for Entrepreneurs – Part 1

Posted on by

startup-1018512_1920Becoming an entrepreneur is an exciting endeavor…but being your own boss often requires that you wear many different hats and take responsibility for all of the details involved with operating a business. After you’ve evaluated your business idea and researched the market, and while you’re in the process of creating your business plan and determining startup costs and other essentials to get your business up and running, here are some legal considerations to keep in mind…

1. Hire Professionals.

Attorneys, accountants and other professionals are invaluable resources for a new business owner, as they can help you navigate through the many details and requirements necessary to start and run your business, including those mentioned below. Seek referrals from friends, family, and other business owners. You may want to find professionals who are familiar with your particular industry and/or working with new businesses. Having good professionals on your business team (especially in the beginning) can be one of the best investments you’ll ever make in your business, and, hopefully, you will develop relationships with these advisors that will last for the life of the business (and beyond). It is often much less expensive to hire a professional to do something right the first time than it is to hire a professional to fix a problem after-the-fact. Although a great deal of information, “forms” and resources are available online and can be helpful for educational purposes, relying on the internet to be your lawyer will likely come back to haunt you at some point.

2. Name Your Business (or Product).

Deciding on the name of your business is one of the most important – and sometimes most difficult – aspects of starting a new business. Not only will you want to make sure the name is appealing to customers, but you’ll also want to make sure the name isn’t already being used by a third party providing identical or similar products or services. Before using or registering a business name, you should at least perform a quick “knockout” availability search: (a) check for entity names and state trademark registrations with Secretary of State Offices where business will be done; (b) search the federal U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) trademark database; and (c) perform a Google search to determine whether any third party has common law rights to the name. If you are in a regulated profession or industry, there may be restrictions of what you can and cannot include in your business name. You’ll also want to make sure the domain name is available for your business name.

Once you decide on a name (and type of entity) and are comfortable that it’s available to use, you’ll need to register your name with your Secretary of State’s Office and potentially with your County Clerk’s Office as well.

Please note that registration of a business name with one or more Secretary of State offices does not guarantee that you have exclusive rights to use that name and/or are not infringing another party’s mark. The Secretary of State does not allow registration of identical business names in its state (mostly to avoid internal confusion). However, multiple entities can register identical fictitious, assumed or doing business as (d/b/a) names in the same state.  [For example, if XYZ Company, LLC is already registered with the Texas Secretary of State, another company could register ZYX Products, LLC and then register a fictitious name for XYZ Company…so it would be ZYX Products, LLC, d/b/a XYZ Company.]

Trademarks or service marks, on the other hand, can be used by multiple entities at the same time, so long as they are not used in connection with the same or similar goods or services and customers are not likely to be confused as to whether the goods or services are provided by the same entity. If your entity is also using its business name as a trademark or service mark in connection with its products or services, then it is advisable to have your legal counsel perform a trademark search to be as certain as possible that no other individual or entity is also using the mark for similar goods or services.  Depending on the results of the search, filing a trademark application with the USPTO to obtain a federal trademark registration for the mark (and/or logo) may be advisable.

Click here for more information about selecting and protecting names and marks.

In Part 2, we’ll discuss legal entities, financing your venture, and related matters.

Can My Company Say “Super Bowl” in Our Super Bowl Ad?

Posted on by

football-player-260556_1280-2By now, you’ve probably seen and heard countless promotions mentioning “The Big Game”…but maybe you’ve never considered why they don’t just come out and say the actual name of the game.  Well, the term Super Bowl is a registered trademark owned by NFL Properties LLC.  And with advertisers spending $5 million or more on 30-second commercial spots for the Super Bowl, it’s little wonder that the NFL is so protective of its trademarks and copyrights.  (And, even if the price tag for an ad isn’t quite as high, the same is true for other big events and recognizable brands, such as the World Series, the Oscars, March Madness and the Final Four, the Emmys, the Grammys, and the Olympics.)

You might remember hearing about the Indiana church that received a cease and desist letter from the NFL related to its plan to project the game on a big screen and charge admission for a Super Bowl party in 2007.  Although it may seem harsh to go after a church, the letter (which had as much to do with the church’s use of the Super Bowl mark as it did with the church’s plans to show the game on a big screen) resulted in that church — as well as other churches that got wind of the letter — to cancel their plans.

Trademark owners have a duty to police their marks in order to avoid losing rights in the marks.  In other words, mark owners are legally required to protect against unauthorized uses of their marks, or they risk diminishing the value of their brands, damaging their goodwill, and weakening their marks and the value attached to those marks.  It would be pretty hard to justify the sponsorship fees and ad rates that “official” sponsors and advertisers pay if any of these mark owners allowed anyone else to benefit without having to shell out for that privilege.

And although sportscasters and news providers can say “Super Bowl” to talk about the game (thanks to a trademark fair use exception for criticism and news reporting), unless you are an approved, official sponsor, you’ll need to get creative instead of using the “Super Bowl” mark (or hashtag, for all you ambush marketer wannabes) to promote your products, services, or sales.

So, enjoy “The Big Game” and all of the “Star-Studded Red Carpet Events” during “Awards Season,” because “The Battle of The Brackets” in March will be here before you know it!

 

New Trade Secrets Law – What it Means for Your Trade Secrets and Your Company

Posted on by

On May 11, 2016, President Obama signed the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”), which went into effect immediately. The DTSA will have a major impact on intellectual property law and also has implications related to employees and independent contractors. Although the DTSA contains elements similar to the Uniform Trade Secret Act adopted in some form by every state except for New York and Massachusetts, there are notable differences. For example, the DTSA creates a federal private/civil confidential-stamp_GyH5lHOdcause of action for trade secret misappropriation. Previously, federal law only provided for criminal actions brought by the government. Available remedies include injunctive relief, exemplary damages in addition to actual damages, and attorneys’ fees. The DTSA also allows for civil seizure of an opponent’s property in extraordinary circumstances. These remedies could provide powerful tools for trade secret protection.

The DTSA provision of most immediate concern is the required employee notice of civil and criminal immunity for whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets to government officials for the purpose of reporting a suspected violation of law. The immunity also protects disclosures to attorneys or in sealed court filings. In order to comply with the DTSA, all agreements with employees, independent contractors or consultants covering trade secrets or confidential information must include notice of the DTSA’s whistleblower safe harbors and immunity. Although the DTSA requires that an employer provide notice of the whistleblower immunity in any agreement with an employee that governs the use of a trade secret or other confidential information, the act defines “employee” to include any individual performing work as a contractor or consultant. Compliance can be achieved by including specific language in the agreement or providing a cross reference to an existing whistleblower policy document, such as an employee handbook. Failure to include the required notice in employment agreements results in the employer losing the right to recover attorneys’ fees or exemplary damages from the employee.

Employers should take the following steps to comply with the DTSA:

  • All agreements concerning trade secrets or confidential information should be revised. This likely includes employment agreements, non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements, contractor agreements, severance or separation agreements, and more. The DTSA notice provision applies to agreements entered into or updated after May 11, 2016.
  • Employers may want to consider changing forum selection clauses in any contract affected by the DTSA. Having federal and state court options could be beneficial in a trade secret or other employment dispute.
  • Contractor or consulting agreements should be amended so that the service provider is required to notify its employees of the DTSA’s whistleblower protections.

Additional compliance issues may arise as case law develops and companies adjust to the DTSA’s requirements.

Happy Birthday Copyright Ruled Invalid

Posted on by

birthday-937520_1280You may be hearing “Happy Birthday” more often now that a federal judge in Los Angeles has ruled that the copyright Warner/Chappell Music claimed to own in the lyrics of the song is invalid.  According to the opinion issued on September 22, 2015, “Because Summy Co. never acquired the rights to the Happy Birthday lyrics, Defendants [Warner/Chappell], as Summy Co.’s purported successors-in-interest, do not own a valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics.”

Unless the ruling is overturned or someone else comes forward with a valid ownership claim, third parties will no longer be required to pay licensing fees to use the song in movies, TV shows, greeting cards and the like…and Warner/Chappell will be out an estimated $2 million a year in royalties it collected from the song.

Click here for more on the story.

Trademarks – Principal Register vs. Supplemental Register

Posted on by

memory-279904_1280

Some marks are not as strong as other marks, and certain marks that are not eligible for registration on the Principal Register, but are “capable” of one day distinguishing an applicant’s goods or services (such as descriptive terms) upon the acquisition of secondary meaning (proof that the mark has become distinctive as applied to the applicant’s goods or services in commerce), may be registered on the Supplemental Register.

Descriptive marks describe an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of the product or service.  Examples of descriptive marks include BANK OF AMERICA for a bank headquartered in the United States and WHOLE FOODS for a grocery store that sells health foods (both of which have since acquired distinctiveness and are now registered on the Principal Register).

Only marks actually used in commerce may be registered on the Supplemental Register, so an intent-to-use application is not eligible for registration on the Supplemental Register until the applicant has filed an acceptable allegation of use.

Benefits of Registration on the Supplemental Register

While not the preferred trademark register, registration on the Supplemental Register does provide the following benefits over purely common law rights (i.e., no registration at all):

  • Notice of the mark to anyone who searches the USPTO records.
  • Protection against third-parties registering confusingly similar trademarks at the USPTO.
  • Right to use the official registered trademark symbol “®” as notice of federal registration.
  • Right to sue infringers in federal court and have federal law control key issues of validity, ownership, infringement, injunctions and damages.
  • Ability to obtain foreign trademark protection in countries with international treaties.
  • After five years of usage and/or registration on the Supplemental Register, the registrant can apply for registration of the mark on the Principal Register.

Benefits of Registration on the Principal Register Not Applicable to the Supplemental Register

The following benefits of registration on the Principal Register are not enjoyed by registration on the Supplemental Register:

  • Constitutes prima facie evidence of the registrant’s exclusive right to use the mark nationwide.
  • Constitutes constructive notice of the registrant’s claim of ownership to eliminate the good faith defense.
  • Has a presumption of validity.
  • Carries a presumption that the registrant is the owner of the registered trademark.
  • May be filed with the United States Customs Service to prevent importation of infringing foreign goods.
  • Can become incontestable after five years of registration.

Acquired Distinctiveness/Secondary Meaning

A mark that is descriptive in nature and/or registered on the Supplemental Register cannot likely be registered on the Principal Register without a showing that the mark has become distinctive of the applicant’s goods or services in commerce, namely, that the mark has “acquired distinctiveness” or “secondary meaning.”

After five years of use or registration on the Supplemental Register, a statement verified by the applicant that the mark has become distinctive of the applicant’s goods or services by reason of substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce by the applicant for the five years before the date when the claim of distinctiveness is made is usually sufficient to show acquired distinctiveness/secondary meaning.

However, depending on the nature of the mark and the facts in the record, the examining attorney may determine that a claim of ownership of a prior registration(s) or a claim of five years’ substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce is insufficient to establish a prima facie case of acquired distinctiveness. The mark owner may then submit actual evidence of acquired distinctiveness.

The amount and character of evidence required to establish acquired distinctiveness depends on the facts of each case and particularly on the nature of the mark sought to be registered.

To support the claim of acquired distinctiveness, a mark owner may respond by submitting additional evidence. Such evidence may include specific dollar sales under the mark, advertising figures (or indicating the types of media through which the goods and services have been advertised (e.g., national television) and how frequently the advertisements have appeared), samples of advertising, consumer or dealer statements of recognition of the mark as a source identifier, affidavits, and any other evidence that establishes the distinctiveness of the mark as an indicator of source.  So, if you are using a descriptive mark, it is wise to keep these requirements in mind and keep track of this information so it is available if needed.

If additional evidence is submitted, the following factors are generally considered when determining acquired distinctiveness: (1) length and exclusivity of use of the mark in the United States by the applicant; (2) the type, expense and amount of advertising of the mark in the United States; and (3) the applicant’s efforts in the United States to associate the mark with the source of the goods or services, such as unsolicited media coverage and consumer studies.  A showing of acquired distinctiveness need not consider all these factors, and no single factor is determinative.

 

Copyright Protection Doesn’t Monkey Around

Posted on by

The U.S. Copyright Office released an updated 1,222-page “Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition” in 2014 clarifying its position that it “will register an original work of authorship, provided that the work was created by a human being.”  The report goes on to state that “[t]he Office will not register works produced by nature, animals, or plants.  Likewise, the Office cannot register a work purportedly created by divine or supernatural beings, although the Office may register a work where the application or the deposit copy(ies) state that the work was inspired by a divine spirit.”  The report provides examples of works that will not be protected by copyright, and the first example is “A photograph taken by a monkey.”

Macaca_nigra_self-portrait_(rotated_and_cropped)

The report was originally released weeks after wildlife and nature photographer David Slater claimed that Wikimedia was infringing his copyrights in the “selfies” taken by macaque monkeys in Indonesia by allowing the pictures to be posted in Wikimedia Commons, a library of public domain photos.  Wikimedia refused to remove the images because it believed the monkey was the photographer, and, therefore, the “author” of the photo…and, as non-humans can’t own copyrights, the photo was in the public domain.  Slater argued that he staged the shot and set up the selfie intentionally, so it’s irrelevant that the monkey pressed the shutter (likening the monkey to an assistant).

Although Slater is still claiming copyright ownership in the photos and could file a lawsuit against Wikimedia (as UK or European law may allow Slater to claim ownership if he employed “labour, skill and judgment” in connection with the photographs or they were part of his “intellectual creation”), he is currently offering free canvas prints of the monkey selfie and donating money to the Sulawesi Crested Black Macaques Conservation Programme for each print redeemed.

 

Social Media Terms of Use – Is Your Brand Following the Rules?

Posted on by

Advertisements and promotions on social media channels are a daily occurrence.  In addition to complying with traditional advertising rules and regulations, brands need to comply with each social media channel’s Terms of Use and advertising-specific rules.

NBC recently ran afoul of Facebook’s rules when it posted a three-minute clip from the latest episode of Saturday Night Live that began with a five-second ad for Subway.  The rules state that “Third-party advertisements on Pages are prohibited, without our prior permission.”  In other words, video clips with ads not sold by Facebook are not allowed…unless a brand enters into an agreement similar to typographic-poster-design-i-have-read-and-accept-the-terms-and-conditions_GJfTZN_dFacebook’s deal with the NFL that allows brands to run ads after clips are shown and gives Facebook takes a piece of the ad revenue.  Earlier this year, Facebook launched Anthology, which connects brands and digital media publishers (like Funny or Die, The Onion and Oh My Disney) to create branded content to be targeted and optimized through Facebook.

The Terms of Use and related policies for each social media channel (Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, etc.) can differ greatly and tend to change frequently. The Terms of Use often contain guidelines or rules for advertising and hosting contests, sweepstakes and other promotions through the social media channel, ownership and (restrictions on) use of content, rules (and prohibitions) for using native functionality (e.g., “share on your Timeline to enter”), and other important information. Some social media channels, such as YouTube, require you to obtain written permission from them before you can post ads or product placements.

Before your brand posts content on a social media channel, be sure to check the rules on each channel to make sure you’re in compliance.

 

What’s in a (Brand) Name?

Posted on by

writing brand concept

Choosing a name for your company, creative project, product or service is just as important as (and often more difficult than) naming a child or pet. Brands are so important that many big companies spend hundreds of thousands of dollars and months or even years on research, focus group testing and the like in attempts to find just the right name or logo for a new product or service.

Your brand distinguishes your products and services from your competitors’ products and services. But a brand is much more than just a name or logo.  Your brand also serves as a symbol of the quality, value, and reputation which customers and fans expect in products you sell and services you provide…not to mention the emotional connection customers and fans can develop with your brand.  For example, if we’re talking about driving a Beetle or listening to The Beatles, you probably don’t just think “car” or “band.”  Instead, you likely have thoughts and emotions related to your experiences with and perceptions of those brands — whether positive or negative.

With so much at stake, choosing a name that will resonate with your customers and fans and convey information about your product or service is important.  When brainstorming a name for your company, creative project, product or service, remember that not all brands are created equal … particularly when it comes to trademark protection.

Brands — also known as Trademarks (used on products) and Service Marks (used in connection with services) — include any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination of these, used, or intended to be used, in commerce to identify and distinguish the goods or services of one entity from those sold or provided by others, and to indicate the source of the goods or services. Trademarks can include entity names, product names, logos, domain names, 800 numbers, slogans, phrases and tag lines, character names, band names, jingles, and trade dress, such as product configurations, color, packaging and store designs.  

The best marks are memorable, appealing and elicit desired responses.  The ultimate goal should be to find a mark that is uniquely yours — a mark that is not confusingly similar to an existing mark used for similar products or services (i.e., someone else beat you to the punch), one that suggests some connection with another organization or famous person, or one that consists of a person’s last name.  And it can take a village of marketing, artistic, business and legal types to find that perfect mark.

While searching for that perfect mark, you should keep in mind that some marks are stronger than others…

  • Generic terms are common names for products or services, such as SALT when used in connection with sodium chloride or THE CHOCOLATIER for a store providing chocolate candy.  These terms can never be protected as trademarks.
  • Descriptive marks describe an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of the product or service, such as SALTY used in connection with crackers or DALLAS.COM for a website providing tourism information about Dallas.  These marks are not initially protectable unless the owner can show that the mark has gained “secondary meaning” or “acquired distinctiveness” (proof that the mark has become distinctive of the mark owner’s goods or services) in the marketplace over time through extensive and substantially exclusive use.
  • Suggestive marks suggest some characteristic or nature of the product or service and require imagination, thought or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of those products or services, such as COPPERTONE for suntan lotion or BLOCKBUSTER for a video rental store. Although there can be a fine line between descriptive and suggestive marks, suggestive marks are automatically protected as trademarks because they are “inherently distinctive.”
  • Arbitrary marks are very strong marks because they have no relation to the product or service, such as APPLE for computers.   However, because these are real words, other companies may have also adopted the words as marks, such as APPLE VACATIONS.
  • Fanciful/coined marks are the strongest marks because they are made up words, such as XEROX for copiers or EXXON for gasoline, and consumers only associate the mark owner with selling that service or product.  

From a trademark protection perspective, fanciful/coined, arbitrary or suggestive marks are preferable to descriptive (protectable with acquired distinctiveness) or generic (never protectable) marks.  Many company, product and service names tend to be descriptive or suggestive because business owners attempt to quickly choose names that help consumers easily identify their products or services.  However, the more creativity you use in the naming process, the stronger the mark and the more likely you are to prevent third parties from being able to use the same or similar mark on similar (or even unrelated) products and services.

Before using or registering a name for your services or products, you should, at the very least, perform a quick “knockout” availability search to see if a third party may already be using the same or similar mark in connection with the same or similar products or services.  You should:

  • Check for entity names and state trademark registrations with Secretary of State Offices where business will be done.
  • Search the U.S. trademark database.
  • Perform a Google search to determine whether third parties have common law rights to the name.
  • Perform a WHOIS search to determine whether domain names are available (as brands typically want a corresponding web presence).

A mark is one of the most important words, phrases or designs you will use to represent your products or services to the world.  Although selecting a name may seem simple, trademark law is very nuanced and is often much more complex than it appears. Therefore, I believe it is a wise investment of resources to engage a trademark attorney to perform more sophisticated searches to determine whether your mark is available and inform you as to the potential risks associated with use and/or registration of your proposed mark.  (Note:  You can save yourself some time and money by performing knockout searches for your potential marks before asking an attorney to search a particular mark more thoroughly.)

Choosing a mark that’s already being used by a third party can result in cease and desist letters and trademark infringement lawsuits…potentially requiring you to abandon use of the mark, destroy all products and materials that depict the mark, and potentially even paying the third party mark owner profits gained from infringing uses of a mark as well as damages the mark owner may have incurred from such infringing use.  The last thing you want to do after spending a bunch of money to print business cards, stationery, packaging, advertising and goodness knows what else emblazoned with your mark is having to scrap everything and start from scratch with another mark.

Hiring a lawyer to guide you during the mark selection process can save you (potentially hundreds of) thousands of dollars and several headaches down the road.

 

Endorsements and Testimonials: Are You Following the Rules?

Posted on by

Does your company use endorsements or testimonials to promote its products or services on its website or in its advertising or marketing materials?  Do you allow customers to post on your social media pages or website?  Are you a blogger who reviews products or services?

When most people hear the words endorsement or testimonial, they likely imagine a celebrity or expert getting paid big bucks to talk about an “amazing” product or service.  And, they would be right.

However, if you answered “yes” to any of the questions above, then you likely need to comply with the Endorsement and Testimonial Guides issued by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”).

Examples of messages that constitute endorsements include a film critic’s review of a movie used in Excellent result on survey on blackboardan advertisement for the film, a well-known athlete using a certain brand of sporting equipment in an ad for that brand, and a positive product review posted by a consumer on her personal blog where the consumer received the product free as part of a network marketing program.

The Guides reflect three basic truth-in-advertising principles:

  1. Endorsements must be truthful and not misleading;
  2. If the advertiser doesn’t have proof that the endorser’s experience represents what consumers will achieve by using the product, the ad must clearly and conspicuously disclose the generally expected results in the depicted circumstances; and
  3. If there’s a connection between the endorser and the marketer of the product that would affect how people evaluate the endorsement, it should be disclosed.

In other words, endorsements:

  1. Must reflect the honest experience or opinion of the endorser (there are different rules for consumer, celebrity and expert endorsements, as well as for endorsements by organizations);
  2. May not contain representations or claims that would be deceptive, or could not be substantiated, if the advertiser made them directly; and
  3. Must disclose any material connection between the person endorsing a product or service and the company selling the product or service that might materially affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement (employee, relative, paid, etc. – even small incentives, such as free product for bloggers to sample, must be disclosed).

Although the Guides don’t mandate the specific wording of disclosures, the Guides states that disclosures “must be clear and conspicuous on all devices and platforms that consumers may use to view the ad”…even if there are only 140 characters available for the entire message.  For example, paid spokespeople must disclose that they are sponsored (#sponsored or #ad) or explicitly mention that they are working with the brand/company (e.g., I’m teaming up with [brand/company] to do X) on social media platforms, such as Twitter.

If you are a brand owner, use caution before you follow, friend, like, or engage with a celebrity, third-party trademark or brand. Do not imply that there is an affiliation between the brand/company and the user/celebrity/trademark/etc….especially when such a relationship doesn’t exist. (Most consumers will assume there is a relationship between the brand/company and the user/celebrity/trademark.)

For more information, see the FTC’s FAQs about endorsements and testimonials.